France’s telecom regulator has ordered Apple to halt sales of the iPhone 12 in the country after finding the device emits radiation beyond legal limits. While Apple contests the move, it has revived lingering questions about cellphone radiation risks.
The Agence Nationale des Fréquences
The Agence Nationale des Fréquences (ANFR), the regulatory body that oversees radio frequencies in France, informed Apple this week that iPhone 12 sales must cease.
ANFR said its testing revealed the iPhone 12’s radiofrequency radiation levels surpass European restrictions when simulated in hand or pocket use. Specifically, the phone’s Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), a measure of how much radiation is absorbed by human tissue, was too high.
In ANFR’s test with the iPhone 12 against the body, mimicking carrying it in a pocket or hand, the SAR measured 5.74 W/kg.
This exceeds the 4 W/kg limit set for such usage in Europe. When tested at a 5 mm distance, simulating a bag or jacket, the phone did comply with the 2 W/kg limit.
Apple swiftly contested ANFR’s move, asserting that the iPhone 12 meets all applicable regulations. The company stated the device has been certified compliant by multiple international health and safety organizations.
According to Apple, it provided its lab results as well as third-party lab results to ANFR proving the phone falls within the required SAR levels. But the French agency was unsatisfied.
Apple now has two weeks to respond further before enforcement action begins. Potential penalties include recalling iPhone 12 units already sold to consumers in France.
Is This the Start of Wider Problems for Apple?
ANFR’s halt on iPhone 12 sales isn’t only a French issue. It could quickly ripple across Europe if other countries follow suit.
Germany’s Federal Network Agency revealed that it is in current talks with French officials on the matter. The agency said it may also take steps against the iPhone 12 if existing data warrants it.
Likewise, a consumer group in Spain urged the country’s authorities to at least temporarily prohibit further iPhone 12 sales based on the French findings.
If the iPhone 12 faces sales bans in multiple major European markets, it would pose a significant headache for Apple. Granted, the iPhone 12 is now three years old, so the financial impacts may be limited.
A recall of any existing units could prove costly both financially and reputationally. For a company that touts designing the “world’s most powerful and personal technology,” such a recall would deal a major blow.
While Apple downplayed concerns, the company will need to provide concrete evidence that satisfies safety agencies across Europe in short order. If not, this story could quickly shift from specific to systemic.
Do Smartphones Pose any Health Risks?
Underpinning the French action against the iPhone 12 is a longstanding debate over the possible health effects of the radiofrequency radiation emitted by cell phones.
For many years, researchers have strived to determine if cell phone radiation exposure causes biological harm. Not just in America, but scientists around the world have conducted numerous studies concerning these speculations.
Most major health agencies say that the weight of current research does not demonstrate any adverse health effects from cell phone radiation at levels typically emitted. This includes organizations like the CDC, FDA, and WHO.
Additionally, they emphasize that modern cell phone radiation levels are extraordinarily low compared to established scientific thresholds.
At the same time, some scientists contend not enough research has been done to rule out potential harm, especially with long-term exposure. Though its adverse effects haven’t been proven, they suggest that caution is necessary until more is known.
In 2020, a meta-analysis found that using cell phones for over 1000 cumulative hours showed increased tumor risk. However, some people heavily criticized the methodology used in attaining the result.
Some major health groups give assurances based on decades of studies, even though a few researchers still raise flags. Ultimately, for many, the fear and doubt still linger.
Measuring Phone Radiation Absorption
To evaluate cell phone risks, regulators first need a consistent way to measure how much radiation is absorbed by the body. Different approaches may explain the discrepancy in the iPhone 12 results.
All cell phones sold in the U.S. and Europe must comply with limits on Specific Absorption Rates (SAR), a gauge of how much radiofrequency energy is absorbed by tissue.
In the United States, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for cell phones is limited to 1.6 Watts per kilogram (W/kg) when averaged over a gram of tissue. Europe sets a 2 W/kg limit over 10 grams of tissue.
Authorities selected these levels to provide a significant safety factor buffer. Apple states the iPhone 12 meets SAR limits under accepted testing methods used globally. However, the French agency’s methodology differs.
ANFR’s test measured the iPhone 12’s emissions in direct contact with human-simulated body tissue, with no barrier or gap. Some other tests introduced spacing to mimic real-world use.
This disparity in approach may explain why the iPhone 12 passed most prior tests yet still exceeded France’s limits. Importantly, a phone’s SAR measurements in controlled labs only reveal so much.
Actual radiofrequency exposure depends greatly on factors like signal strength during use. “The exposure coming out of your phone is changing all of the time,” said non-ionizing radiation expert Dr. Rodney Croft.
So, while ANFR’s findings raised eyebrows, some experts have a different perspective since tests can’t completely simulate real variability.
Precautionary Measures Users Can Take
With the jury still out on cellphone radiation risks, people wanting to be extra careful do have options to reduce exposure just in case. Some of the ways to prevent or reduce the adverse effects of radiation posed by smartphones include:
1. Increase Distance from Head and Body
“Distance is your friend,” says consumer advocate Dr. Joel Moskowitz. Using headsets or speakerphones keeps the phone away from your head, lowering the level of absorbed radiation.
Carrying your phone in a bag instead of a pocket also adds space between your body and the source.
Texting more while limiting long voice calls directly to your face may also help. The goal is to maximize distance from you whenever possible.
2. Check Your Phone’s Reported SAR
Search for “RF exposure” information in your phone’s settings to find its stated SAR level per model. Note that this varies from your actual usage of radiation but offers awareness. Some smartphones may show a reduced SAR level, but this doesn’t make them completely harmless.
3. Avoid Direct Contact or Overheating
As a rule of thumb, avoid leaving your phone resting directly on your body for prolonged periods, especially when it’s performing a task or charging.
Though current evidence says otherwise, limiting skin contact and preventing overheating reduces any chance of biological effects on the body.
What Now for Apple and the iPhone 12?
The dust is far from settled over France’s findings and allegations about the iPhone 12’s radiation emissions. Apple is standing firm but still faces potential repercussions.
The company now has two weeks to present ANFR with satisfactory proof that the iPhone 12 meets European SAR limits under accepted testing conditions.
This may require further detailed lab results. If not, French authorities appear ready to force a recall of iPhones already sold.
France’s Digital Minister suggested that a software update on Apple phones, limiting their transmission power could be sufficient to resolve any existing issues. This may be an easier path forward for Apple.
But it would still constitute an acknowledgment of some compliance problem, even if minor. Apple has so far avoided this, rejecting all non-compliance claims outright.
Regulators across the EU seem poised to scrutinize the iPhone 12 in their respective markets. If this issue remains unresolved, expanded sales bans would be a realistic possibility.
Stepping back, France’s sudden iPhone 12 rejection refocuses the perpetual debate over mobile radiation risks after it lost steam in recent years. It seems likely to spur a new wave of discourse and consciousness.
If multiple regulators echo France’s findings, it would highlight the issue beyond just Apple phones. Larger questions would bubble up, like whether current SAR limits sufficiently protect users.
For a company like Apple that is constantly seeking to expand its global market, even faint whispers of health concerns tied to its flagship products could pose subtle but serious challenges.
This story is a serious setback, but we believe that Apple certainly has strong incentives to swiftly put it to rest. How consumers, health experts, and regulators react to Apple’s counterevidence will prove pivotal.
Also Read: Apple Smart Watch Introduces AFib History Feature To Its Indian Users
Broader Impacts: Consumer Trust and 5G Concerns
While the debate over the iPhone 12’s radiofrequency emissions focuses on technical measurements, it could have broader implications for consumer trust and emerging 5G networks.
ANFR’s high-profile callout of excessive radiation from the iPhone 12 may plant seeds of doubt among consumers about phone safety generally.
Even if scientifically unfounded, the notion of Apple’s new 5G-enabled phone exceeding legal limits could make some shoppers second-guess planned upgrades.
Consumer surveys consistently show a portion of buyers are wary of potential health risks from cellphone radiation. A loss of public confidence in safety could impact sales.
Likewise, as carriers continue rolling out next-generation 5G networks globally, lingering consumer concerns threaten to hamper adoption. Despite using different spectrums, 5G networks will suffer the same doubts over health effects as past network generations if safety questions go unresolved.
Industry leaders are eager to avoid losing momentum for 5G. But success requires continuing to address radiation worries – both legitimate and overblown. Responsible regulators and companies should view situations like the iPhone 12 controversy as opportunities to educate the public.
By better explaining existing safety standards, addressing uncertainty, and committing to transparency, the industry can potentially reassure many who remain unsure.
Failure to take consumer worries seriously or unethical attempts to suppress inconvenient findings will only enable misinformation and scaremongering.
Prudent Precautions for Consumers
Stepping back from the French regulator’s findings, consumers trying to make sense of cellphone radiation risks should focus on the broader scientific consensus to guide their behaviors.
Leading global health institutions universally agree that decades of research have not demonstrated adverse health effects from the radiation levels cell phones emit during typical usage.
While unable to prove total safety, especially for intensive long-term use, most experts emphasize that this represents the best current evidence.
However, consumers shouldn’t necessarily interpret the lack of evidence for harm as proof that phones are 100% safe under all circumstances.
Taking sensible precautions to limit exposure, like using headsets, carrying phones away from the body, and reducing unnecessary contact, makes prudent sense for those still concerned.
Importantly, cell phones emit just a fraction of the radiation from other sources we encounter regularly, like Wi-Fi, FM radio, and microwave ovens. Their low power minimizes risk.
Maintaining a reasonable perspective about relative risks helps avoid both complacency and unnecessary panic regarding cellphone radiation specifically. More high-quality, independent research on the biological impacts of cellphone radiation should continue, especially on long-term effects.
Ideally, companies will proactively fund such research and welcome transparent findings, even if they are inconvenient. The public needs reliable data to make informed choices about safe usage.
In the meantime, consumers should let evidence guide their behaviors, not fears.
